The idea which this comes from is flawed. Guns are made for destruction ONLY. Even self defense is destruction to a point.
However, it does seem that a woman raped in an alley, choked by her own pantyhose is somehow more morally acceptable then a woman explaining how her attacker got that fatal wound.
Now, I'm not a gun nut, nor liberal. I have my own views on all topics. But, if you're a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN, then I feel you have the right to bare arms, within reason.
If you want a gun from protection, and the first gun you go for is an M4-Carbine with full auto and drum magazine, you might not need one.
That example play out a bit too much. Again, I'd allow even concealed carry, within reason.
lol I'm going to be puzzling over this all day. Its tough because we have to assume that guns do cause crime, even though I don't believe that is true. Normally I would just say no the camera doesn't. But because, we have to say that guns do... I don't know. lol.
what a totally illogical argument/point. I hope its a joke.
ReplyDeletejk
ReplyDeletenice point, but, guns dont make crimes, PEOPLES make same way people make child porn
ReplyDeleteawesome, I have to agree here!
ReplyDeleteZOMG BAN THE CAMERA!
ReplyDeletewe have the right to bear film!
ReplyDeletegood point
ReplyDeletethat's a good point.
ReplyDeleteThe idea which this comes from is flawed. Guns are made for destruction ONLY. Even self defense is destruction to a point.
ReplyDeleteHowever, it does seem that a woman raped in an alley, choked by her own pantyhose is somehow more morally acceptable then a woman explaining how her attacker got that fatal wound.
Now, I'm not a gun nut, nor liberal. I have my own views on all topics. But, if you're a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN, then I feel you have the right to bare arms, within reason.
If you want a gun from protection, and the first gun you go for is an M4-Carbine with full auto and drum magazine, you might not need one.
That example play out a bit too much. Again, I'd allow even concealed carry, within reason.
I want camera.
ReplyDeleteWell... cameras are designed to picture people, so let's say Child Porn is 0,01% of the overall use for cameras around the world.
ReplyDeleteNow, a gun is designed to injure, hurt badly and kill, so the bad uses of a gun is 99% fucking people's life.
So, I have to say: ban the gun
well said 3rd shift
ReplyDeleteYou know, thats an interesting thought. But then the same could be said about cars, they kill people too.
ReplyDeletegr8 poast!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletegood post, supporting
ReplyDeletei can side with you on this
ReplyDeletehmm, well... would been better without all theese guns in the world, thats for sure!
ReplyDeleteinteresting question
ReplyDeletewho are these people on a mountain to "allow" the second ammendment? get the fuck out of america
ReplyDeletecameras are made to capture the moment, while a gun is made to CAP someones ass
ReplyDeleteGood question ...
ReplyDeleteCool post man!!
ReplyDeleteIn some countries pencils cause it too
ReplyDeletecriminals cause crime, pedophiles cause child porn
ReplyDeletenope people do
ReplyDeletelol I'm going to be puzzling over this all day. Its tough because we have to assume that guns do cause crime, even though I don't believe that is true. Normally I would just say no the camera doesn't. But because, we have to say that guns do... I don't know. lol.
ReplyDelete3rd shift clerk said it perfectly
ReplyDeletedo coats cause flashers? :)
ReplyDeleteNeither guns cause crime nor cameras cause child porn.
ReplyDeleteNeither are capable.
What they, or any other items are used for is completely down to those who possess the items.